athlete alibi
Sports Medicine Injury Recovery Strength Training Nutrition Hydration Player Profiles Biomechanics Active Recovery
AboutContactPrivacy Policy

How Altitude Changes Fluid Loss In Mountain Towns

Athletes arriving at training camps in the Rockies lose more fluid than they expect. Several mechanisms operate at once, and none of them produce the sensation of having worked harder.

Losses through breathing

Air at altitude is thinner and typically much drier, and every breath humidifies incoming air using water from the respiratory tract.

Athletes also breathe more at altitude, since lower oxygen pressure drives increased ventilation both at rest and during exercise.

More air moved, each breath drier, means respiratory water loss climbs substantially. It is invisible because it does not appear as sweat.

The kidneys respond too

On arrival at altitude the body reduces plasma volume, partly through increased urine output during the first days.

This is an adaptive response that raises the concentration of red cells relative to plasma, improving oxygen carrying capacity per unit of blood.

The consequence for the athlete is real fluid loss on top of the respiratory losses, occurring at the same time and for entirely different reasons.

Why thirst does not compensate

Thirst is an unreliable guide at sea level and becomes less reliable at altitude, where the sensation is often blunted relative to actual need.

The cool, dry conditions of a mountain morning also remove the ordinary cues. An athlete who is not visibly sweating does not feel like someone losing fluid.

Which is why altitude protocols specify scheduled drinking rather than drinking to thirst during the first period after arrival.

Sweat that disappears before it is seen

In dry air, sweat evaporates almost immediately, which is efficient for cooling and misleading for the athlete's perception of loss.

Clothing stays comparatively dry and skin does not feel wet, so the visual evidence that normally prompts drinking is absent.

Athletes accustomed to humid conditions elsewhere in the country are most affected, because their internal calibration was built somewhere the sweat stayed visible.

What this means for the first week

Performance decrements at altitude are expected and largely reflect reduced oxygen availability, but part of the early decline is fluid related and correctable.

Teams therefore monitor body mass on arrival and through the first days, using the same morning weight comparison used in summer camps.

Adjusting expectations matters as well. Training intensity is usually reduced initially, and separating altitude adaptation from avoidable dehydration requires measuring rather than guessing which one is at work.

A bone stress injury is built to give almost no warning

The athlete says it came out of nowhere and they are more or less telling the truth. Bone had been failing quietly for weeks. It simply has no good way of saying so.

The sequence is well described. Repeated loading produces microcracks in the mineral matrix, which is normal and happens constantly. Remodelling clears them, in a cycle that begins by resorbing the damaged section before laying down new bone. When the rate of damage outpaces the rate of clearance, the resorption cavities accumulate, and the region becomes measurably weaker while looking, to the athlete, entirely fine. That is the middle phase, and it is invisible from the outside.

Sensation arrives late because of where the nerves are. Bone itself carries limited innervation through its substance. The rich supply sits in the periosteum, the sleeve on the outside, so pain generally begins once swelling or a developing fracture line irritates that layer. By the time a shin hurts to touch, the tissue underneath has been in trouble for some time.

Compare that to muscle, which complains the next morning, or tendon, which announces itself in the first ten minutes of a session. Bone gets no such warning system, and I think that asymmetry deserves more weight than it gets. It is the reason bone injuries are managed on the basis of history rather than symptoms, and why an athlete with two weeks of vague, diffuse shin ache who has recently doubled their running deserves a serious conversation rather than a reassurance.

The known accelerants all attack the clearance side of the equation rather than the damage side. Low energy availability suppresses the hormonal environment that bone remodelling depends on, and does so quickly. Disrupted menstrual function is a signal about bone before it is a signal about anything else. Recent illness, hard dieting, and heavy travel all count.

Which is why the highest risk athlete is rarely the one training the most. It is the one training a lot while eating too little, and the second variable is invisible on any load report.

Pain that starts diffuse and becomes a point you can cover with one finger is the sequence to know.

By then the process is nearly finished, and the question is no longer prevention.